Skip to content
1882
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1780-3187
  • E-ISSN: 2034-2101

Abstract

Abstract

In Jacques Rancière’s essay “The Distribution of the Sensible,” Rancière basically argues that any object may be used to make Art inasmuch as Art in the 21st century is no longer subject to essential criteria that condition how an object ought to be represented. While admittedly Rancière has had a minimal impact on Food Studies, the idea that any food object is Art is a central aesthetic-theoretical supposition within Food Studies and the food world at large. Employing Roman Ingarden’s central thesis in namely, that particular artworks are intentional objects conditioned by their particular intentional sensate structures, I argue one must understand the “food artwork” as an absolutely particular ontological object that is conditioned by the intentional sensate structures of the food object and not its representational aims. In doing so, I also question what is traditionally thought to be the relation between ideas and sense-perception as well as the hierarchy of the senses in 18th century Western thought by way of an interpretation of Condillac’s and a consideration of Michel Onfray’s To illustrate my argument, I consider two examples of what I deem to qualify as “food artworks,” namely, Chef Heston Blumenthal’s “Bacon-and-Egg Ice Cream” and, by way of considering Walter Benjamin’s writings on reproducibility and its relation to artworks, “Locavore dishes.”

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100979
2010-01-01
2025-12-08

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100979
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv