Skip to content
1882
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2506-6730
  • E-ISSN: 2506-6749

Abstract

Abstract

The article discusses the pandemic against the backdrop of the recent globalisation of environmental history research. It proposes to view COVID-19 as an exemplary case for the conceptual challenges of the global environment. Rather than searching for the one narrative that captures the essence of the pandemic, scholars should focus on the entanglements of multiple threads. The article identifies four trends that converged in the current pandemic: the global spread of the coronavirus, the efforts of the medical sciences, the global circulation of iconic pictures, and the forceful interventions of nationstates in the fight against the virus and the support of struggling peoples and economies. Each of these trends had its own set of requirements and consequences, but it was the amalgamation of these four narratives that shaped the trajectory of COVID-19 responses. The entangled narratives created a surprisingly narrow path of legitimate action, which suggests that entanglements tend to act as constraints in environmental history. This runs counter to a tendency in global history writing that cherishes entanglements as harbingers of an exuberance of possibilities. The article acknowledges the significance of national and regional differences. But scholars are encouraged to look beyond the specifics. Environmental challenges create a baseline of similarities that transcend national borders, as the current pandemic has shown. If COVID-19 is a typical case for environmental challenges in an age of globalisation, we can view the multidimensional narratives that it requires as a template for environmental history writing across the board. Against this background, the article makes the case for a new style of entangled, non-linear history writing. It discusses the challenges of non-linear histories with particular attention to the moral and methodological quagmires. It also shows how linear narratives gain a fairy tale quality in the face of a multidimensional crises. COVID-19 has opened a narrative void that environmental historians should seek to fill.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122467
2020-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackerknecht, E. H. (1948) ‘Anticontagionism Between 1821 and 1867’, Bulletin of the History of Medicine, 22, pp. 562593.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barry, J. M. (1998) Rising Tide: The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 and How It Changed America, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beckett, L. (2020) ‘Older people would rather die than let COVID-19 harm US economy – Texas official’, The Guardian, 24 March 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/24/older-people-would-rather-die-than-let-COVID-19-lockdown-harm-us-economy-texas-official-dan-patrick.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Clements, K. A. (2006) Hoover, Conservation, and Consumerism: Engineering the Good Life, Lawrence.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Daniel, P. (1977) Deep’n as It Come: The 1927 Mississippi River Flood, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Evans, R. J. (1987) Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years, 1830–1910, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Klein, N. (2008) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Maier, C. S. (2012) ‘Leviathan 2.0: Inventing Modern Statehood’, in: Rosenberg, E. S. (ed.), A World Connecting 1870–1945, Cambridge, pp. 27282.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. McNeill, W. H. (1976) Plagues and People, Garden City.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. McNeill, W. H. (1991) The Rise of the West: A History of the Human Community, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller, D. L. (1997) City of the Century: The Epic of Chicago and the Making of America, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mizelle, R. M. Jr. (2014) Backwater Blues: The Mississippi Flood of 1927 in the African American Imagination, Minneapolis.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Osterhammel, J. (2014) The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century, Princeton.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rosen, G. (1993) A History of Public Health. Expanded Edition, Baltimore.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rosenberg, C. E. (1966) ‘Cholera in Nineteenth-Century Europe: A Tool for Social and Economic Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 8, pp. 452463.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Rosenberg, C. E. (1987), The Cholera Years: The United States in 1832, 1849, and 1866, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sontag, S. (2003) Regarding the Pain of Others, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Steinberg, T. (2000) Acts of God: The Unnatural History of Natural Disaster in America, New York.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zeheter, M. (2015) Epidemics, Empire, and Environments: Cholera in Madras and Quebec City, 1818–1910, Pittsburgh.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122467
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv