Skip to content
1882
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2506-6730
  • E-ISSN: 2506-6749
read_more Read

Abstract

Abstract

Ecologists and environmentalists have tried to interfere in the debate about the COVID-19 pandemic with the aim of transcending the approaches of virologists and epidemiologists. While the views of virologists and epidemiologists are often limited to the virus as an isolated organic element, those of ecologists and environmentalists mostly connect it to environmental issues such as the destruction of wild life habitats. This is valuable, but a broader view is also necessary with regard to how the virus is received and dealt with. This essay will frame the scientific and political responses to SARS-CoV-2 within a long-term perspective, not by simply pointing at the historical precedents of the quarantine and hygienic measures, but by historicizing and denaturalizing the scientific and political rationales behind them. As this inevitably includes the way in which science and politics interact, I will have recourse to the work of both Bruno Latour and Michel Foucault, which enables the conceptual and analytical framing of the virus and the rationalities of governance related to it to be unpacked. While Latour’s ideas help explain why the virus is framed as an isolated natural organism which threatens to invade the human body from the outside, Foucauldian concepts reveal the specific forms of governance and political subjectivity involved - which are predicated on discourses of danger and ‘security dispositives’. Jointly these views explain why, in contrast to the ideas of climatologists, the models of virologists and epidemiologists are followed almost unconditionally.

Open-access
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122468
2020-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Aradau, C., and Blanke, T. (2010) ‘Governing circulation: A critique of the biopolitics of security’ in: De Larrinaga, M., and Doucet, M.G. (eds), Security and global governmentality. Globalization, governance and the state, London, pp. 4458.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, B., Bloor, D., and Henry, J. (1996) Scientific knowledge. A sociological analysis, Chicago, 1996.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk society. Towards a new modernity, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruno, I., Jany-Catrice, F., and Touchelay, B. (eds) (2016) The social sciences of quantification. From politics of large numbers to target-driven policies, Cham.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. (eds) (1991) The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality, Chicago.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chave, S. P. W. (1984) ‘The origins and development of public health’, in: Holland, W.W., Detels, R., and Knox, G. (eds), Oxford textbook of public health, Vol. 1: History, determinants, scope, and strategies, Oxford, pp. 120.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Desrosières, A. (2002) The politics of large numbers. A history of statistical reasoning, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dillon, M., and Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008) ‘Biopolitics of security in the 21st century. An introduction’, Review of International Studies, 34, 2, pp. 265292.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Emami, A., et al. (2020) ‘Prevalence of underlying diseases in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 8, 1, e35.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Foucault, M. (1976) Histoire de la sexualité I: La volonté de savoir, Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Foucault, M. (2001) ‘Omnes et singulatim: vers une critique de la raison politique’, in: Defert, D., and Ewald, F. (eds) Dits et Écrits, Paris, pp. 953980.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Foucault, M. (2007) Security, territory, population. Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–1978, Senellart, M. (ed.), Basingstoke.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway world. How globalization is reshaping our lives, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gordon, C. (1991) ‘Governmental rationality: An Introduction’, Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P. (eds), The Foucault effect. Studies in governmentality, Chicago, pp. 152.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hanlon, P., et al. (2020) ‘COVID-19 – exploring the implications of long-term condition type and extent of multimorbidity on years of life lost: a modelling study’, Wellcome Open Research, 5, 75, 15849.1.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Harman, G. (2009) Prince of networks. Bruno Latour and metaphysics, Melbourne.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020) ‘Coronavirus disease 2019. The harms of exaggerated information and non-evidence-based measures’, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 50, 4, eci.13222.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Joyce, P. (2003) The rule of freedom: Liberalism and the modern city, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Landler, M., and Castle, S. (2020) ‘Behind the virus report that jarred the U.S. and the U.K. to action’, The New York Times, 17 March 2020, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/coronavirus-imperial-college-johnson.html.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Latour, B. (1988) Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Latour, B. (1993) The Pasteurization of France, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Latour, B. (1993) We have never been modern, Cambridge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Latour, B. (2005) Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory, Oxford.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Massay-Kosubek, Z., and Matteis, S. De (eds) (2020) ‘Coronavirus threat greater for polluted cities’, European Public Health Alliance, 16 March 2020, https://epha.org/coronavirus-threat-greater-for-polluted-cities/.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Mitchell, T. (2002) Rule of experts. Egypt, techno-politics, modernity, Berkeley.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Nuki, P. (2020) ‘The terrifying data behind the government’s sudden coronavirus lockdown’, The Telegraph, 17 March 2020, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/terrifying-data-behind-government-coronavirus-lockdown/.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Poovey, M. (1998) A history of the modern fact. Problems of knowledge in the sciences of wealth and society, London.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rose, N. (1995) ‘Towards a critical sociology of freedom’, in: Joyce, P. ed., The Oxford Reader on Class, Oxford, pp. 213224.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Smith, C. (2020) ‘Stanford University epidemiologist John Ioannidis calls out media for panicking the public over COVID-19’, Straight.com, 10 April 2020, https://www.straight.com/COVID-19-pandemic/stanford-university-researcher-john-ioannidis-relies-on-data-to-puncture-some-of-myths-about.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wichum, R. (2013) ‘Security as dispositive. Michel Foucault in the field of security’, Foucault Studies, 15, pp. 164171.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yang, J., et al. (2020) ‘Prevalence of comorbidities and its effects in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 94, pp. 9195.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1484/J.JHES.5.122468
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv