oa Hayek at the Santa Fe Institute: Origins, Models, and Organization of the Cradle of Complexity Sciences

References

1. Abell, B. (1995). Message from Bruce Abell, vice president, finance and operation: Hard choices in SFI's second decade. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 10(1), 0.
2. An interview with L. M. Simmons: Creating the right environment. (1990). Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 5(1), 8–11.
3. Anderson, P. (1972). More is different. Science, 177, 393–396.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson, P., Arrow, K., & Pines, D. (1988). The global economy as an evolving complex system. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.
5. Anderson, P., Meyer, A., Eisenhardt, K., Carley, K., & Pettigrew, A. (1999). Introduction to the special issue: Applications of complexity theory to organization science. Organization Science, 10(3), 233–236.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Arthur, W. B. (1999). Complexity and the economy. Science, 284, 107–109.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Arthur, W. B. (2015). Complexity and the economy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Arthur, W. B. (2021). Foundations of complexity economics. Nature Reviews Physics, 3, 136–145. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Arthur, W. B., Beinhocker, E. D., & Stanger, A. (2020). Complexity economics: Dialogues of the applied complexity network I: Proceedings of the Santa Fe Institute's 2019 fall symposium. Santa Fe, NM: SFI Press.
10. Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S., & Lane, D. (1997). The economy as an evolving complex system II. New York, NY: Westview.
11. Audier, S. (2012). Néo-libéralisme(s): Une archéologie intellectuelle. Paris, France: Grasset.
12. Axelrod, R. (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Axelrod, R., & Cohen, M. D. (1999). Harnessing complexity: Organizational implications of a scientific frontier. New York, NY: The Free Press.
14. Axtell, R. L. (2016). Hayek enriched by complexity enriched by Hayek. In P. Boettke & V. Storr (Eds.), Revisiting Hayek's political economy (pp. 63–121). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
15. Aziz-Alaoui, M. A., & Bertelle, C. (Eds). (2009). From system complexity to emergent properties: Understanding complex systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
16. Baake, K. (1999). Language issues. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 14(2), 28–29.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Baker, E. (2022). The ultimate think tank: The rise of the Santa Fe Institute libertarian. History of the Human Sciences. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Banegas, D. (1991). Order out of chaos. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 6(1), 20.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Banegas, D. (1998). Mutual fund manager Bill Miller sees value in the business network: His practical approach to picking stocks looks to SFI for useful insights. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 13(1), 13–14.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Barabási, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means for business, science, and everyday life. London, UK: Plume.
21. Barbieri, F. (2013). Complexity and the Austrians. Filosofia de la economia, 1, 47–69.
22. Barkley Rosser, J. (2010). How complex are the Austrians. In R. Koppl, S. Horwitz, & P. Desrochers (Eds.), What is so Austrian about Austrian economics? (pp. 165–179). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
23. Bass, T. (2000). The predictors: How a band of maverick physicists used chaos theory to trade their way to a fortune on Wall Street. New York, NY: Holt.
24. Beck, J. (2008a). Cities: Large is smart. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 23(1), 4–8.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Beck, J. (2008b). The revolutionary lizard. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 23(1), 9–11.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Beck, J. (2008c). Patterns of terror. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 23(1), 18–21.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Bedau, M., & Humphreys, P. (2008). Emergence: Contemporary readings in philosophy and science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Beinhocker, E., & Hanauer, N. (2014, September 1). Redefining capitalism. McKinsey Quarterly. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/long-term-capitalism/redefining-capitalism
29. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. PNAS, 104(17), 7301–7306.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Bill Miller: Life trustee and chairman emeritus. (n.d.). Santa Fe Institute. Retrieved from https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/bill-miller
31. Blandin, N. M. (2007). Leading at the edge of chaos. In R. S. Morse, T. F. Buss, & C. M. Kinghorn (Eds.), Transforming public leadership for the 21st century (pp. 138–153). New York, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
32. Blume, L., & Durlauf, S. (2005). The economy as an evolving complex system III: Current perspectives and future directions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Verso.
34. Bonabeau, E., Dorigo, M., & Theraulaz, G. (1999). Swarm intelligence: From natural to artificial systems. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35. Boucher, S., & Royo, M. (2012). Les think tanks: Cerveaux de la guerre des idées. Paris, France: Edition du Félin.
36. Bourgine, P., & Johnson, J. (2006). Living roadmap for complex systems science: Version 1.22. Project FP6-IST 29814, Open Network of Centres of Excellence in Complex Systems (ONCE-CS).
37. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38. Bowles, S., Gintis, H., & Groves, M. O. (Eds.). (2009). Unequal chances: Family background and economic success. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
39. Busch, L. (2017). Knowledge for sale: The neoliberal takeover of higher education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. 1). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
41. Cilliers, P., & Spurrett, D. (1999). Complexity and post-modernism: Understanding complex systems. South African Journal of Philosophy, 18, 258–274.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Clippinger, J. H. (1999). The biology of business: Decoding the natural laws of enterprise. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
43. Colander, D. (Ed.). (2000). Complexity and the history of economic thought. London, UK: Routledge.
44. Cooper, M. (2008). Life as surplus: Biotechnology and capitalism in the neoliberal era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
45. Cooper, M. (2011). Complexity theory after the financial crisis: The death of neoliberalism or the triumph of Hayek? Journal of Cultural Economy, 4, 371–385.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Cowan, G. (1989). Read on [Book review]. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 4(2), 3–4.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Cowan, G. (2010). Manhattan project to the Santa Fe Institute: The memoirs of George A. Cowan. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
48. Cowan, G., Pines, D., & Meltzer, D. (Eds.). (1994). Complexity: Metaphors, models, and reality. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
49. Curlee, W., & Gordon, R. L. (2011). Complexity theory and project management. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
50. Dean, J. S., Gumerman, G. J., Epstein, J. M., Axtell, R. L., Swedlund, A. C., Parker, M. T., & McCarroll, S. (2000). Understanding Anasazi culture change through agent-based modeling. In T. A. Kohler & G. J. Gumerman (Eds.), Dynamics in human and primate societies: Agent-based modeling of social and spatial processes (pp. 179–206). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Dent, M., Chandler, J., & Barry, J. (2017). Questioning the new public management. London, UK: Routledge.
52. Dillon, M., & Reid, J. (2001). Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war. Millennium, 30(1), 41–66.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Dupuy, J.-P. (1992). Le sacrifice et l'envie: Le libéralisme aux prises avec la justice sociale. Paris, France: Calmann-Lévy.
54. Durand, C. (2020). Technoféodalisme: Critique de l'économie numérique. Paris, France: Zones.
55. Elsner, W. (2017). Complexity economics as heterodoxy: Theory and policy. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(4), 939–978.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Elsner, W., Heinrich, T., & Schwardt, H. (2015). The microeconomics of complex economies: Evolutionary, institutional, neoclassical, and complexity perspectives. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
58. Erwin, C. E., Karklins, L., Knox, K., Lifshitz, N., & Piccio, E. (2007). Finding aid for the Murray Gell-Mann papers 1931–2001, bulk 1955–1993. Online Archive of California. Retrieved from https://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt687026tv/entire_text/
59. Felt, U., Fouché, R., Miller, C. A., & Smith-Doerr, L. (Eds.). (2017). The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
60. Fisher, G. (2012, February 10). The complexity of Hayek. Synthesis. Retrieved from http://www.synthesisips.net/blog/the-complexity-of-hayek/
    [Google Scholar]
61. Fontana, M. (2010). The Santa Fe perspective on economics: Emerging patterns in the science of complexity. History of Economic Ideas, 18, 167–196.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Foster, J. (2005). From simplistic to complex systems in economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29, 873–892.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Foster, R. N., & Kaplan, S. (2001). Creative destruction: Why companies that are built to last underperform the market, and how to successfully transform them. New York, NY: Currency/Doubleday.
64. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
65. Fox-Keller, E. (2009). Organisms, machines, and thunderstorms: A history of self-organization, part two: Complexity, emergence, and stable attractors. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, 39(1), 1–31.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Frame, J. D. (2002). The new project management: Tools for an age of rapid change, complexity, and other business realities (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
67. Fraisopi, F. (2012). La complexité et les phénomènes: Nouvelles ouvertures entre science et philosophie. Paris, France: Hermann.
68. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science. Vancouver, Canada: Empirical Press.
69. Friedman, D., & Rust, J. (1993). The double auction market: Institutions, theories, and evidence. New York, NY: Westview.
70. Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar: Adventures in the simple and the complex. London, UK: Abacus.
71. Gere, C. (2002). Digital culture. London, UK: Reaktion Books.
72. Gingras, Y., & Schinckus, C. (2012). Institutionalization of econophysics in the shadow of physics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 34, 109–130.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Gintis, H. (2002). Keeping it in the family: Does inheritance play a role in inequality? Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 17(1), center section.
74. Gleick, J. (1988). Chaos: Making a new science. London, UK: Sphere Books.
75. Goldberg, E. (1996). President's message. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 11(2), 1.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Graham, R. (1998). Evolving businesses, with a Santa Fe Institute twist: SFI's business network meeting offers participants a competitive edge. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 13(1), 8–10.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Graham, R. (1999). John Miller: A modeler of messy theories. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 14(1), 15–18.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Greene, B. (2003). The elegant universe: Superstrings, hidden dimensions, and the quest for the ultimate theory. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.
79. Haldane, A. (2009). Rethinking the financial network. Speech delivered at the Financial Students Association, Amsterdam, Bank of England. Bank of England. Retrieved from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2009/rethinking-the-financial-network
80. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
81. Hayek, F. A. (1978). Law, legislation, and liberty, Vol. 2: The mirage of social justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
82. Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
83. Heller, C. (2002). From scientific risk to paysan savoir-faire: Peasant expertise in the French and global debate over GM crops. Science as Culture, 11, 5–37.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Helmreich, S. (1998). Silicon second nature: Constructing artificial life in a digital world. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
85. Helmreich, S. (2000). Flexible infections: Computer viruses, human bodies, nation-states, evolutionary capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(4), 472–491.
    [Google Scholar]
86. Hidalgo, C., & Hartmann, D. (2017). Economic complexity, institutions and income inequality. In P. Love & J. Stockdale-Otárola (Eds.), Debate the issues: Complexity and policy making (pp. 55–57). Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
87. Hightower, R. (1991). Emergent computation and learning from nature. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 6(2), 25–26.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Hoddeson, L. (1982, July 27). Interview of Murray Gell-Mann. American Institute of Physics. Retrieved from https://www.aip.org/history-programs/niels-bohr-library/oral-histories/32880
89. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
90. Holland, J. H. (1992). Genetic algorithms. Scientific American, 267(1), 66–73.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Holland, J. H. (1996). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
92. Holland, J. H. (2014). Complexity. A very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
93. Holt, R. P., Rosser Jr, J. B., & Colander, D. (2011). The complexity era in economics. Review of Political Economy, 23(3), 357–369.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Hooker, C. A. (Ed.). (2011). Philosophy of complex systems. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
95. Horgan, J. (1995). From complexity to perplexity. Scientific American, 272, 74–79.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Jasanoff, S. (Ed.). (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. London, UK: Routledge.
97. Jen, E. (1999). Evolutionary dynamics. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 14(1), A–F.
98. Kauffman, S. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
99. Kauffman, S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
100. Kelly, K. (1992). A distributed Santa Fe system. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 7(1), 4–6.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Kelly, K. (1994). Out of control: The new biology of machines, social systems, and the economic world. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley.
102. Kepler, T. (1992). One long argument [Book review]. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 7(1), 16–17.
     [Google Scholar]
103. Khalil, W. R. (2014). Complexity management: Managing organizations in complex environments. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing.
104. Kilpatrick, H. E. (2001). Complexity, spontaneous order, and Friedrich Hayek: Are spontaneous order and complexity essentially the same thing? Complexity, 6, 16–20.
     [Google Scholar]
105. King, L. S. (2004a). Good taste in science: Robert Eisenstein. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 19(1), 2–6.
     [Google Scholar]
106. King, L. S. (2004b). The origins of the Santa Fe Institute. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 19(2), 3–13.
     [Google Scholar]
107. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
108. Knapp, E. (1991). The first six months. President's message. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 6(2), 3.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
110. Knyazeva, H. (2005). Figures of time in evolution of complex systems. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 36, 289–304.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Koppl, R. (2009). Complexity and Austrian economics. In J. Rosser & J. Barkley (Eds.), Handbook of complexity research (pp. 393–408). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
112. Krugman, P. (1996). The self-organizing economy. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
113. Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., & Wiesner, K. (2013). What is a complex system? European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(1), 33–67.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Langton, C. (1988). Toward artificial life. Whole Earth Review, 58, 74–79.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Langton, C. (Ed.). (1997). Artificial life: An overview. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
116. Levin, S. (1999). Fragile dominion: Complexity and the commons. New York, NY: Perseus Books.
117. Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Company.
118. Lichtenstein, B. (2016). Emergence and emergents in entrepreneurship: Complexity science insights into new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(1), 43–52.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Li Vigni, F. (2018). Les systèmes complexes et la digitalisation des sciences: Histoire et sociologie des instituts de la complexité aux États-Unis et en France (Doctoral dissertation). Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, Paris, France.
120. Li Vigni, F. (2020a). Le projet épistémique des sciences des systèmes complexes. Philosophia scientiæ, 24(1), 181–200.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Li Vigni, F. (2020b). The failed institutionalization of “complexity science”: A focus on the Santa Fe Institute's legitimization strategy. History of Science, 59(3), 344–369.
     [Google Scholar]
122. Li Vigni, F. (2021). Complexity sciences: A scientific platform. Science & Technology Studies, 34(4), 30–55.
     [Google Scholar]
123. Lorenz, C. (2012). If you're so smart, why are you under surveillance? Universities, neoliberalism, and new public management. Critical Inquiry, 38, 599–629.
     [Google Scholar]
124. Markose, S. M. (2005). Computability and evolutionary complexity: Markets as complex adaptive systems. The Economic Journal, 115, 159–192.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Matarasso, P. (2007). La construction historique des paradigmes de modélisation intégrée: William Nordhaus, Alan Manne et l'apport de la Cowles Commission. In A. Dahan (Ed.), Les modèles du futur (pp. 44–62). Paris, France: La Découverte.
126. Mauboussin, M. (2006). More than you know: Finding financial wisdom in unconventional places. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
127. May, R., Levin, S. & Sugihara, G. (2008). Complex systems: Ecology for bankers. Nature, 451, 893–895.
     [Google Scholar]
128. McMillan, E. (2003). Complexity, organizations and change. London, UK: Routledge.
129. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens III, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the Club of Rome's project on the predicament of mankind. New York, NY: Universe Books.
130. Medvetz, T. (2012). Think tanks in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
131. Metropolis, N. (1988). 1988 SFI activities include summer school, study of world problems. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 3(1), 16–17.
     [Google Scholar]
132. Miller, J. (2016). A crude look at the whole: The science of complex systems in business, life, and society. New York, NY: Basic Books.
133. Mirowski, P. (1996). Do you know the way to Santa Fe? In S. Pressman (Ed.), Interaction in political economy: Malvern after ten years (pp. 13–40). London, UK: Routledge.
134. Mirowski, P. (2011). Science-mart: Privatizing American science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
135. Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road to Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
136. Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity. A guided tour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
137. Moore, K., Kleinman, D. L., Hess, D., & Frickel, S. (2011). Science and neoliberal globalization: A political sociological approach. Theory and Society, 40, 505–532.
     [Google Scholar]
138. Murphy, E. C., & Murphy, M. A. (2002). Leading on the edge of chaos: The 10 critical elements for success in volatile times. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
139. Nason, R. (2017). It's not complicated: The art and science of complexity in business. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
140. New approaches to economic challenges—Complexity of the economy. (2015). OECD. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/naec/newapproachestoeconomicchallenges-complexityoftheeconomy.htm
141. Newman, M. (2011). Complex systems: A survey. American Journal of Physics, 79, 800–801.
     [Google Scholar]
142. Newman, M. (2018). Networks. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
143. Nicolis, G., & Prigogine, I. (1989). Exploring complexity: An introduction. New York, NY: Freeman.
144. North, M. J., & Macal, C. M. (2007). Managing business complexity: Discovering strategic solutions with agent-based modeling and simulation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
145. Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and complexity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
146. Palmer, R. G., Arthur, W. B., Holland, J. H., LeBaron, B., & Tayler, P. (1994). Artificial economic life: A simple model of a stockmarket. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 75, 264–274.
     [Google Scholar]
147. Paraskevas, A. (2006). Crisis management or crisis response system? A complexity science approach to organizational crises. Management Decision, 44(7), 892–907.
     [Google Scholar]
148. Pearce, D. (1994). Complexity theory and economics. Agenda, 1, 101–110.
     [Google Scholar]
149. Pestre, D. (2003). Science, argent et politique. Versailles, France: Quæ.
150. Pias, C. (2011). On the epistemology of computer simulation. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung, 1, 29–54.
151. Pines, D. (Ed.). (1988). Emerging syntheses in science: Proceedings of the founding workshops of the Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, New Mexico (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Perseus Books.
152. Rassekh, F. (2009). In the shadow of the invisible hand. History of Economic Ideas, 17(3), 147–165.
     [Google Scholar]
153. Reinhoudt, J., & Audier, S. (2018). The Walter Lippmann colloquium: The birth of neo-liberalism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
154. Rehmeyer, J. (2012). Fighting HIV: The evolution solution. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 26, 28–31.
     [Google Scholar]
155. Rescher, N. (1998). Complexity: A philosophical overview. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction Publishers.
156. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (2004). Academic capitalism in the new economy: Challenges and choices. American Academic, 1, 37–60.
     [Google Scholar]
157. Richardson, G. (1991). Activity update: Research. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 6(2), 29–32.
     [Google Scholar]
158. Richardson, G. (2003). Editor's note. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 18(1), 0.
159. Richardson, G., & Reed, P. (1996–1997). With Erica Jen. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 12(1), 7–11.
     [Google Scholar]
160. Rockmore, D. (2009). World of finance. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 24, 29–31.
     [Google Scholar]
161. Rothschild, M. (1990). Bionomics: The inevitability of capitalism. New York, NY: Henry Holt.
162. Roughgarden, J. (2009). The genial gene: Deconstructing Darwinian selfishness. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
163. Sam Bowles: Professor. (n.d.). Santa Fe Institute. Retrieved from https://www.santafe.edu/people/profile/sam-bowles
164. Schasfoort, J. (2017, September 18). Complexity economics. Exploring Economics. Retrieved from https://www.exploring-economics.org/en/orientation/complexity-economics/
165. Schinckus, C. (2021). The Santa Fe Institute and econophysics: A possible genealogy? Foundations of Science, 26, 925–945. https://doi.org/ [Crossref]
     [Google Scholar]
166. Schumpeter, J. (1983). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction Publishers.
167. Schumpeter, J. (2003). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. London, UK: Routledge.
168. Schweber, S., & Wächter, M. (2000). Complex systems, modelling and simulation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 31, 583–609.
     [Google Scholar]
169. SFI. (1991). Santa Fe Institute 1991 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
170. SFI. (1997). Santa Fe Institute 1997 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
171. SFI. (2007). Santa Fe Institute 2007 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
172. SFI. (2009). Santa Fe Institute 2009 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
173. SFI. (2011). Santa Fe Institute 2011 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
174. SFI. (2013). Santa Fe Institute 2013 annual report. Santa Fe, NM: SFI.
175. SFI listed in global think tank report. (2020, February 7). Santa Fe Institute. https://www.santafe.edu/news-center/news/2019-global-think-tank-rankings
176. Shalizi, C. (1999). What can emergence tell us about today's eastern Europe? Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 14(1), 8–10.
     [Google Scholar]
177. Shaw, P. (2002). Changing conversations in organizations: A complexity approach to change. London, UK: Routledge.
178. Simmons, L. M. (1987). SFI profile: John Holland. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 2(1), 8–11.
     [Google Scholar]
179. Simmons, L. M. (1988). Artificial life: Computation and biology mixed. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 3(1), 15.
     [Google Scholar]
180. Simmons, L. M. (1989). The human immune system: AIDS, abzymes, and evolution. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 4(1), 16–17.
     [Google Scholar]
181. Simmons, L. M. (1990). 1990 research. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 5(2), 17–20.
     [Google Scholar]
182. Simmons, L. M. (1992a). Selected updates on research visitors: Spring 1992. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 7(1), 28–31.
     [Google Scholar]
183. Simmons, L. M. (1992b). SFI business network. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 7(2), 47.
     [Google Scholar]
184. Simmons, L. M. (1993). Project 2050: Transition to sustainability. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 8(2), 9–10.
     [Google Scholar]
185. Slobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: The end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
186. Smith, J. M. (1995). Life at the edge of chaos? New York Review of Books, 42(2), 28–30.
     [Google Scholar]
187. Stacey, R., Griffin, D., & Shaw, P. (2000). Complexity and management: Fad or radical challenge to systems thinking? London, UK: Routledge.
188. Stein, D. L. (1989). Spin glasses. Scientific American, 261, 52–61.
     [Google Scholar]
189. Stites, J. (1994). W. Brian Arthur. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 9(2), 5–8.
     [Google Scholar]
190. Stites, J. (1995). Beyond business as usual. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 10(1), 5.
     [Google Scholar]
191. Taborsky, P. (2014). Is complexity a scientific concept? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 47, 51–59.
     [Google Scholar]
192. The Nobel prize and RAND. (n.d.). RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/about/history/nobel.html
193. Thornton, T. (2016). The “complexity revolution” seen from a historical and heterodox perspective. In J. Courvisanos, J. Doughney, & A. Millmow (Eds.), Reclaiming pluralism in economics (pp. 238–250). London, UK: Routledge.
194. Tucker, W. (1996). Complex questions: The new science of spontaneous order. Reason, 1. Retrieved from https://reason.com/1996/01/01/complex-questions/
     [Google Scholar]
195. Vaughn, K. I. (1999). Hayek's theory of the market order as an instance of the theory of complex, adaptive systems. Journal des économistes et des études humaines, 9, 241–256.
196. Vieille-Blanchard, E. (2007). Croissance ou stabilité? L'entreprise du Club de Rome et le débat autour des modèles. In A. Dahan (Ed.), Les modèles du futur (pp. 21–43). Paris, France: La Découverte.
197. Vieille-Blanchard, E. (2010). Modelling the future: An overview of the “limits to growth” debate. Centaurus, 52(2), 91–116.
     [Google Scholar]
198. Vriend, N. J. (2002). Was Hayek an ACE? Southern Economic Journal, 68, 811–840.
     [Google Scholar]
199. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
200. Walker, J. (2020). More heat than life: The tangled roots of ecology, energy, and economics. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
201. Weiss, C. (1991). Organizations for policy analysis: Helping government think. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
202. West, G. (2006). A deceptively simple formula. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 21(1), 2.
     [Google Scholar]
203. West, G. (2007). Bold irreverence meets humble respect. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 22(1), 0–1.
204. Whitfield, J. (2008). Markets: Learning from nature. Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 23(1), 33–37.
     [Google Scholar]
205. Williams, L. (2012). Modeling, building, writing: A history of nonlinear dynamics and complex systems (Doctoral dissertation). Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
206. Wimsatt, W. C. (1994). The ontology of complex systems: Levels of organization, perspectives, and causal thickets. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(supp. 1), 207–274.
     [Google Scholar]
207. Wolfram, S. (2012, May 7). It's been 10 years: What's happened with A New Kind of Science? Stephen Wolfram Writings. Retrieved from https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2012/05/its-been-10-years-whats-happened-with-a-new-kind-of-science/
208. Woodside, A. G. (2017). The complexity turn: Cultural, management, and marketing applications. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
209. Zuchowski, L. (2018). Complexity as a contrast between dynamics and phenomenology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 63, 86–99.
     [Google Scholar]