Skip to content
1882
Volume 66, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0008-8994
  • E-ISSN: 1600-0498

Abstract

Abstract

This study situates 16th-century ornament prints within the contexts of print culture, entrepreneurial publishing, textual and visual rhetorics, and the practical knowledge encoded in technical texts. It suggests that it is worth taking seriously the explicit claims on the title pages to ornament-print series that the designs are “useful” for particular categories of artists. Comparisons with theaters of machines show that ornament prints participated in a broader instructional genre that aimed to convey as much about design and making strategies as it did about objects and artworks. The reconstruction of historical making processes by which ornament designs could have been translated into their destination media offers promise for understanding how, exactly, ornament prints might have been useful, particularly as “recipes” for early modern art. Considering ornament prints as analogs of technical literature and how-to texts offers art historians a much-needed materialist perspective to augment their formalist and iconographic approaches, while it offers historians of science a new corpus of non-verbal technical sources to better understand early modern design thinking and making processes. The understanding of what counts as a “how-to” text can be refined or reformulated to make space for a genre of art—ornament prints—that has hitherto been valued predominantly for its imaginative, fantasy forms rather than its utility for artisanal practice.

This is an open access article made available under a cc by 4.0 International License.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.145222
2024-01-01
2025-12-05

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cnt/66/4/J.CNT.5.145222.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.145222&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alonso-Almeida, F. (2013). Genre conventions in English recipes, 1600–1800. In M. DiMeo & S. Pennell (Eds.), Reading and writing recipe books, 1550–1800 (pp. 68–90). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
  2. Bambach, C. (1999). Drawing and painting in the Italian Renaissance workshop: Theory and practice, 1300–1600. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bernard of Clairvaux. (1996). Apology (Apologia), 1125 (D. Burr, Trans.). Internet History Sourcebooks, Fordham University. Retrieved from https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/bernard1.asp
  4. Bilak, D., Boulboullé, J., Klein, J., & Smith, P. H. (2016). The making and knowing project: Reflections, methods, and new directions. West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture, 23(1), 3555. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bloom, J. J. (2009). The role of painters before the rise of painting: The Master of Frankfurt's Festival of the Archers. Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek (NKJ), 59, 7189.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. A. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  7. Bredekamp, H. (1995). The lure of antiquity and the cult of the machine: The Kunstkammer and the evolution of nature, art, and technology. Princeton, NJ: Markus Wiener Publishers.
  8. Brisman, S. (2018). A matter of choice: Printed design proposals and the nature of selection, 1470–1610. Renaissance Quarterly, 71(1), 114164. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Cellini, B. (1568). Due trattati: Uno intorno alle otto principali arti dell'oreficeria, l'altro in materia dell'arte della scultura …. Florence, Italy: Valente Panizzij & Marco Peri.
  10. Cibelli, D. H. (1994). Architectural title pages and frontispieces in Renaissance printed books (Doctoral dissertation). State University of New York, Binghamton, NY.
  11. Clark, L. R. (2023). Courtly mediators: Transcultural objects between Renaissance Italy and the Islamic world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Connelly, F. S. (2012). The grotesque in Western art and culture: The image at play. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Corbett, M., & Lightbown, R. (1979). The comely frontispiece: The emblematic title-page in England 1550–1660. London, UK: Routledge.
  14. Dackerman, S. (Ed.). (2011). Prints and the pursuit of knowledge in early modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Art Museums.
  15. Dacos, N. (1969). La découverte de la Domus Aurea et la formation des grotesques à la Renaissance. London, UK: Warburg Institute.
  16. Dacos, N. (2008). The loggia of Raphael: A Vatican art treasure. New York, NY: Abbeville Press Publishers.
  17. Denucé, J. (1932). De Antwerpsche “konstkamers”: Inventarissen van kunstverzamelingen te Antwerpen in de 16e En 17e eeuw. 's-Gravenhage, The Netherlands: Nijhoff.
  18. Dolza, L. (2003). Reframing the language of inventions: The first theatre of machines. In W. Lefèvre, J. Renn, & U. Schoepflin (Eds.), The power of images in early modern science (pp. 89–104). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser. [Crossref]
  19. Dolza, L., & Vérin, H. (2004). Figurer la mécanique: L'énigme des théâtres de machines de la Renaissance. Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine (1954-), 51(2), 7–37.
  20. Eamon, W. (1994). Science and the secrets of nature: Books of secrets in medieval and early modern culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. Falk, T., & Zijlma, R. (Eds.). (1986). Hollstein's German engravings, etchings and woodcuts 1400–1700. Blaricum, The Netherlands: Van Ghendt.
  22. Ferguson, E. S. (1992). Engineering and the mind's eye. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  23. Fors, H., Principe, L. M., & Sibum, H. O. (2016). From the library to the laboratory and back again: Experiment as a tool for historians of science. Ambix, 63(2), 8597. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuhring, P. (2004). Ornament prints in the Rijksmuseum II: The seventeenth century (3 Vols.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rijksmuseum.
  25. Gabriëls, J. (1958). Het Nederlandse ornament in de Renaissance: De geest der vormen. Leuven, Belgium: Davidsfonds.
  26. García Brosseau, E. (2019). Nagas, naginis y grutescos: Púlpitos barrocos de la India portuguesa como triunfos ibéricos contra la idolatría (siglos XVII a XVIII) (1st ed.). Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas.
  27. Gattei, S. (2009). The engraved frontsipiece of Kepler's Tabulae Rudolphiniae (1627): A preliminary study. Nuncius, 24(2), 341365. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Gingerich, O. (1971). Johannes Kepler and the Rudolphine tables. Sky and Telescope, 42(6), 328333.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Griffiths, A. (2013). Some ornament prints and their link with craftsmanship. In D. Saunders, M. Spring, & A. Meek (Eds.), The Renaissance workshop (pp. 114–120). London, UK: Archetype Publications.
  30. Halleux, R. (2009). Le savoir de la main: Savants et artisans dans l'Europe pré-industrielle. Paris, France: Armand Colin.
  31. Hansen, M. F. (2018). The art of transformation: Grotesques in sixteenth-century Italy. Roma, Italy: Edizioni Quasar.
  32. Hedicke, R. (1913). Cornelis Floris und die Florisdekoration: Studien zur niederlándischen und deutschen Kunst im XVI. Jahrhundert. Berlin, Germany: Julius Bard.
  33. Hendriksen, M. M. A. (2020). Rethinking performative methods in the history of science. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 43(3), 313322.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Heuer, C. P. (2009). The city rehearsed: Object, architecture, and print in the worlds of Hans Vredeman de Vries. New York, NY: Routledge.
  35. Horace. (2014). Satires. Epistles. The art of poetry (H. R. Fairclough, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  36. Huysmans, A. (1996). Cornelis Floris 1514–1575: Beeldhouwer, architect, ontwerper. Brussels, Belgium: Gemeentekrediet.
  37. Jenkins, C., Orenstein, N., & Spira, F. (Eds.). (2019). The renaissance of etching. New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  38. Jessen, P. (1920). Der ornamentstich; geschichte der vorlagen des kunsthandwerks seit dem mittelalter. Berlin, Germany: Verlag für Kunstwissenschaft.
  39. Johnson, A. F. (1933). A catalogue of engraved and etched English title-pages down to the death of William Faithorne, 1691. London, UK: Printed for the Bibliographical Society at the Oxford University Press.
  40. Johnson, A. F. (1936). A catalogue of Italian engraved title-pages in the sixteenth century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press for the Bibliographical Society.
  41. Jonge, K. de., & Ottenheym, K. (Eds.). (2007). Unity and discontinuity: Architectural relations between the Southern and Northern low countries 1530–1700. Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
  42. Kant, I. (2000). Critique of the power of judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Karr Schmidt, S., & Nichols, K. (2011). Altered and adorned: Using Renaissance prints in daily life. Chicago, IL: Art Institute of Chicago.
  44. Kavaler, E. M. (2000). Renaissance gothic in the Netherlands: The uses of ornament. The Art Bulletin, 82(2), 226251. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Kavaler, E. M. (2017). Power and performance: The Bruges mantelpiece to Charles V. Nederlands Kunsthistorisch Jaarboek, 67(1), 214255. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Keller, A. (1964). A theatre of machines. New York, NY: Macmillan.
  47. Kuyper, W. (1994). The triumphant entry of Renaissance architecture into the Netherlands. The joyeuse entrée of Philip of Spain into Antwerp in 1549. Renaissance and Mannerist architecture in the Low Countries from 1530 to 1630 (Vols. 1–2). Alphen aan de Rijn, The Netherlands: Canaletto.
  48. Landau, D., & Parshall, P. W. (1994). The Renaissance print: 1470–1550. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  49. Lee, J. H., Ostwald, M. J., & Gu, N. (2020). Design thinking: Creativity, collaboration and culture. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
  50. Lefèvre, W. (Ed.). (2004). Picturing machines 1400–1700. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Crossref]
  51. Leong, E. (2020). Learning medicine by the book: Reading and writing surgical manuals in early modern London. BJHS Themes, 5, 93110. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Lincoln, E. (2000). The invention of the Italian Renaissance printmaker. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  53. Long, C. (2009). The origins and context of Adolf Loos's “Ornament and crime.” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 68(2), 200223. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Long, P. O. (2001). Openness, secrecy, authorship: Technical arts and the culture of knowledge from antiquity to the Renaissance. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  55. Luscombe, D. (2005). The architect and the representation of architecture: Sebastiano Serlio's frontispiece to Il terzo libro. Architectural Theory Review, 10(2), 3453. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Mahoney, M. S. (2004). Drawing mechanics. In W. Lefèvre (Ed.), Picturing machines 1400–1700 (pp. 281–306). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Crossref]
  57. Miller, E. (1999). 16th-century Italian ornament prints in the Victoria and Albert Museum. London, UK: V&A Publications.
  58. Miller, E. (2019). Antonio Lafreri's architecture and ornament volumes: Crossing the boundary between books and volumes of prints in late sixteenth-century Rome. Renaissance Studies, 33(5), 761788. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Necipoğlu, G., & Payne, A. A. (Eds.). (2016). Histories of ornament: From global to local. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  60. Nickel, H., Pyhrr, S. W., & Tarassuk, L. (Eds.). (1982). The art of chivalry: European arms and armor from the Metropolitan Museum of Art: An exhibition. New York, NY: The Federation.
  61. Porras, S. (2023). The first viral images: Maerten de Vos, Antwerp print, and the early modern globe. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  62. Quiccheberg, S. (1565). Inscriptiones vel tituli theatri amplissimi …. Munich, Germany: Ex officina Adami Berg.
  63. Quiccheberg, S. (2013). The first treatise on museums: Samuel Quiccheberg's “Inscriptiones” 1565 (M. A. Meadow & B. Robertson, Eds. & Trans.). Los Angeles, CA: Getty Research Institute.
  64. Quintilian. (1920). The Institutio oratoria of Quintilian (Vols. 1–4; H. E. Butler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  65. Ramelli, A. (1588). Le diverse et artificiose machine del capitano Agostino Ramelli. Paris, France: n.p. Retrieved from https://digital.sciencehistory.org/works/4b29b614k
  66. Ramelli, A. (1976). The various and ingenious machines of Agostino Ramelli (1588) (M. T. Gnudi, Trans.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  67. Remmert, V. R. (2011). Picturing the scientific revolution. Philadelphia, PA: Saint Joseph's University Press.
  68. Riegl, A. (1893). Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. Berlin, Germany: George Siemens.
  69. Riegl, A. (1901). Die spätrömische Kunst-Industrie nach den Funden in Österreich-Ungarn in Zusammenhange mit der Gesammtentwicklung der bildenden Künste. Vienna, Austria: Staatsdruckerei.
  70. Smith, M. M. (2000). The title-page, its early development, 1460–1510. London, UK: British Library.
  71. Smith, P. H. (2004). The body of the artisan: Art and experience in the scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  72. Smith, P. H. (2010). Why write a book? From lived experience to the written word in early modern Europe. Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, 47, 2550.
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Smith, P. H. (2016). Historians in the laboratory: Reconstruction of renaissance art and technology in the Making and Knowing Project. Art History, 39(2), 210233. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Smith, P. H. (2022). From lived experience to the written word: Reconstructing practical knowledge in the early modern world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  75. Smith, P. H., Uchacz, T. H., Pitman, S., Taape, T., & Debuiche, C. (2020). The matter of ephemeral art: Craft, spectacle, and power in early modern Europe. Renaissance Quarterly, 73(1), 78131.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Speelberg, F. (2012). Blackwork: A new technique in the field of ornament prints (ca. 1585–1635). Metropolitan Museum of Art. Retrieved from http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/blak/hd_blak.htm
  77. Speelberg, F. (2015). Fashion & virtue: Textile patterns and the print revolution, 1520–1620. New York, NY: Metropolitan Museum of Art.
  78. Speelberg, F. (2024). “Noch vil höher, und subtiler Künsten … an tag zu bringen”: Renaissance pattern books and ornament prints as catalysts of the design process. Zeitschrift Für Kunstgeschichte, 87(1), 4867. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Taape, T., Smith, P. H., & Uchacz, T. H. (2020). Schooling the eye and hand: Performative methods of research and pedagogy in the Making and Knowing Project. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 43(3), 323340.
    [Google Scholar]
  80. The Making and Knowing Project, Smith, P. H., Rosenkranz, N., Uchacz, T. H., Taape, T., Godbarge, C., … & Catapano, T. (Eds.). (2020). Secrets of craft and nature in Renaissance France: A digital critical edition and English translation of BnF Ms. Fr. 640. New York, NY: Making and Knowing Project. Retrieved from https://edition640.makingandknowing.org
  81. Turel, N. (2019). Paintworks au vif to paintings from life: Early Netherlandish paintings in the round and the invention of indexicality. In T. Balfe, J. Woodall, & C. Zittel (Eds.), Ad vivum? Visual materials and the vocabulary of life-likeness in Europe before 1800 (pp. 122–150). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
  82. Uchacz, T. H. (2019). Outside-in: The monstrous intrusion of ornament into sacred narrative. In M. Fabricius Hansen & C. Askholt Hammeken (Eds.), Ornament and monstrosity in early modern art (pp. 95–132). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
  83. Uchacz, T. H. (in press). Antiquity, authority, and artistic identity: Experimental grotesque frame design and its contexts. In A. J. Di Furia (Ed.), Antiquity in the Netherlands. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam Press.
  84. Van den Brink, P. (Ed.). (2005). ExtravagAnt! A forgotten chapter of Antwerp painting, 1500–1530. Antwerp, Belgium: Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten.
  85. Van der Stock, J. (1998). Printing images in Antwerp: The introduction of printmaking in a city: Fifteenth century to 1585. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sound & Vision Interactive.
  86. Van Grieken, J., Luijten, G., & Van der Stock, J. (Eds.). (2013). Hieronymus Cock: The Renaissance in print. Brussels, Belgium: Mercatorfonds.
  87. Vecellio, C. (2008). The clothing of the Renaissance world: Europe, Asia, Africa, the Americas: Cesare Vecellio's Habiti antichi et moderni (M. F. Rosenthal & A. R. Jones, Trans.). New York, NY: Thames & Hudson.
  88. Veldman, I. M. (1986). Leerrijke reeksen van Maarten van Heemskerck. Haarlem, The Netherlands: Frans Halsmuseum.
  89. Viljoen, M. (2016). Christopher Jamnitzer's Neuw Grotteßken Buch, cosmography, and early modern ornament. Art Bulletin, 98(2), 213236.
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Vitruvius. (2014). On architecture (Vols. 1–2; F. Granger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  91. Waters, M. J. (2012). A Renaissance without order: Ornament, single-sheet engravings, and the mutability of architectural prints. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 71(4), 488–523. [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Weston, R. (2011). Form follows function. In R. Weston (Ed.), 100 ideas that changed architecture (pp. 120–121). London, UK: Laurence King.
  93. Witcombe, C. L. C. E. (2008). Print publishing in sixteenth-century Rome: Growth and expansion, rivalry and murder. London, UK: Harvey Miller Publishers.
  94. Zimmermann, P. S. (2005). The relation to practice in the publications of Hans Vredeman de Vries. In P. Lombaerde (Ed.), Hans Vredeman de Vries and the Artes mechanicae revisited (pp. 15–31). Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols.
  95. Zorach, R. (2005). Blood, milk, ink, gold: Abundance and excess in the French Renaissance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  96. Zorach, R. (2008). The virtual tourist in Renaissance Rome: Printing and collecting the Speculum Romanae Magnificentiae. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  97. Zorach, R., & Rodini, E. (Eds.). (2005). Paper museums: The reproductive print in Europe, 1500–1800. Chicago, IL: David and Alfred Smart Museum of Art.
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.145222
Loading
/content/journals/10.1484/J.CNT.5.145222
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv