Skip to content
1882
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1780-3187
  • E-ISSN: 2034-2101

Abstract

Abstract

The paper discusses the relationship between the religious sphere and the consumption of meat of any origin, coming either from butchery shops or from domestic slaughtering, which is only analogically concerned with the question of ritual slaughtering, for its context is not a public one. It starts with recalling briefly the limits of the available evidence (the current silence of testimonies about ordinary ritual gestures) and the variety of information according to diverse types of evidence. Then, a brief look on Christian and late pagan texts shows how polemical and apologetic discourses played on the shifting and elusive nature of ritual acts of consecration and added to the opacity of evidence. There were unsacrificed meats sold at the macellum as in the case of hunted animals. And yet, even for sacrificial meats, at the moment when they were sold, the question of their relationship with the religious sphere no longer counts since they had been “profaned”.

Abstract

L’article traite des relations entre la sphère religieuse et la consommation de la viande, qu’il s’agisse de viandes de boucherie stricto sensu ou des viandes issues d’opérations bouchères domestiques, pour lesquelles la question de la consécration de l’animal n’est qu’analogique, puisque le contexte n’était pas public. Un bref rappel est d’abord fait des limites de la documentation (le silence habituel des sources sur les gestes rituels banals) et des apports informatifs différents selon les types de sources. Ensuite, un flash sur la documentation chrétienne et païenne tardive indique comment des argumentaires polémiques et apologétiques ont joué de la nature non démonstrative et labile des gestes rituels de consécration et ajouté à l’opacité du dossier. Il a existé des viandes vendues au macellum qui n’avaient pas été sacrifiées – tel était le cas du gibier –. Mais, même pour les viandes d’origine sacrificielle, au moment de la commercialisation, la question de leur relation avec la sphère religieuse ne se pose plus puisqu’elles ont été “profanées”.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100184
2007-01-01
2025-12-06

Metrics

Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1484/J.FOOD.1.100184
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field.
Please enter a valid email address.
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An error occurred.
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error:
Please enter a valid_number test
aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYnJlcG9sc29ubGluZS5uZXQv