Antiquité Tardive - Late Antiquity - Spätantike - Tarda Antichità

Where, how long, and in what manner did the Roman games continue? While this note does not pretend to answer these questions definitively, they are nevertheless here approached in light of new studies, with special attention paid to the burden of tradition, which seems often to obscure – if unconsciously – part of history. The “effort of memory” is not an exclusively modern phenomenon. Whatever the mechanisms which trigger it might be, it is ubiquitous in all times and in all civilisations, and manifests itself by means of different modalities, be they oral or written, mythological or historical. Memory is an integral part of people’s knowledge of their own time. Whatever form it takes and whatever events or personalities it seeks to highlight, memory is necessarily selective, and the portrait is draws is partial, in every sense of the word. More often than not, the choices made by memory generate ignorance, and this ignorance is perpetuated rather than eliminated by subsequent generations, until eventually deeply embedded in the transmission of our knowledge. Late Antiquity has been profoundly affected by the capriciousness of memory. A telling illustration is provided by the Roman games, which the so-called Renaissance and following centuries preferred to have disappear with the fall of the Roman Empire and the rise of Christianity. This “faulty memory” even persists to a certain extent today.

In a Roman empire where a variety of religious choices abounded – some of them exclusive in character – public festivals present two images which are at first sight contradictory. Promoted by the authorities, they transcended their religious dimension to become occasions for a koinônia founded on aspects of a common identity (political, social and traditional). In this respect they belong to a “secular” aspect of antiquity. Yet this consensual image, though consistent with the religious pluralism of the period, coexists with another, much closer to the standard western perception. Quite apart from the public executions which delighted the “société du spectacle” of antiquity, festivals often resulted in the unleashing of anti-Christian movements, while simultaneously uniting the Christian Fathers in opposition to them. From the anthropological point of view, this bipolarisation of the atmosphere of the festival reflects its innate character as an occasion segregated from everyday life, which permits access to the gods / to God. Historically, it corresponds to the tensions perceptible in the religious world from the second century onwards between participation in common religious debates and practices and the affirmation of identity. Such an interpretative framework would explain why (a) in the late empire festivals offered space to the “secular”; (b) as a result, they were at first little affected by religious change; and (c) since they provided an opportunity for the expression of collective identities, they were suitable occasions for denouncing the Other, if he was felt to be - or represented as - a threat to the community. With the gradual christianisation of the imperial power in the fourth century, the definition of the “sacred” underwent a change and religious rivalries intensified. Nevertheless the authorities continued to patronise and support festivals which included the “secular” element, in view of their consensual nature and their progressive disengagement from traditional religious activities. In the fifth century, when the politics, society and religion of the empire were dominated by a new concept of sacrality, this “secular” space inevitably became the object of censure and, as a result, festivals were forced to modify their raison d’être and/or their ceremonial practices.

The laws of the Theodosien Code illustrate the fact that in the second half of the 4th and at the beginning of the 5th century, the Imperial State had to accept protocols established by the Church concerning baptism and the liberation – under certain conditions – of actresses and actors tied to the stage as part of the theatrical munus, as well as – though here more readily – ecclesiastical decisions relating to their excommunication and therefore to the revocation of their liberation. In a contradictory way, it was also the State’s prerogative to maintain the production of theatrical shows as part of ludi scaenici since these latter were, along with ludi circenses, components of imperial worship and the Imperial State. Faced with a dearth of actress, for the most part baptised, the Empire employed pragmatism and did not hesitate, in periods of need, to call baptised actresses back to the stage in spite of the Church’s requirements and its hostility towards ludi.

Au cours des dernières décennies, théâtre, sport et spectacles publics sont devenus le centre d’intérêt croissant des historiens étudiant les mondes hellénistiques et romains ainsi que l’Antiquité tardive. Le présent article souhaite simplement attirer l’attention sur un certain nombre de découvertes et de nouvelles avancées dans ce domaine. Les fouilles récentes menées à Olympie ont notamment apporté une contribution importante : en révélant que le site avait manifestement conservé son activité normale en 385 de notre ère, elles pourraient bien en effet remettre en question les circonstances dans lesquelles Olympie a disparu. Par ailleurs, l’abondante publication sur les jeux du cirque fournit une information nouvelle et essentielle ; sont particulièrement remarquables les inscriptions éditées par M. Rey-Coquais sur l’hippodrome de Tyr, qui amènent des témoignages supplémentaires sur la formation et l’organisation des factions des Bleus et des Verts.

The work, turned to analyse the title 6.4 De praetoribus et quaestoribus of CTh, is conceived in the light of the constitutional structure of the late Roman empire, of the rules concerning the senatorum lectio (based on the fact that ordo senatorius is to identify with the senate) and of the bigger influence of the senate of Rome compared with the senate of Constantinople. The legislation of the late Roman empire shows that the praetura is formally defined as munus only from the times of Marcian (CJ, 1.39.2), even though appears like this evolved at least from the times of Constantine. The different weight of the two assemblies, that involved bigger burdens to disadvantage of the senators of Rome, can be ascertained also in matter of evasion of duty of the praetura and seems to confirm a thesis relating to protostasia (introduced by Constantius II with regard to the senators of Constantinople as method of exaction in matter of praebitio tironum, then applied by Valens to all subjects of pars Orientis and never introduced into the pars Occidentis).

In this work, we study the figure of the tribunus uoluptatum, a not much known official who performed his office between the Vth and VIth centuries. We examine his date of creation – shortly before year 414 – and the cities where it is mentioned – Rome and Milan. We analyze also the law of the Theodosian Code concerning this office (XV, 7, 13), as well as the letters of the Variae of Cassiodorus, mainly the formula tribuni uoluptatum (VII, 10). We finish this study with the prosopographical notices of the tribuni uoluptatum known by the moment, and with one annex of the texts of Variae where Cassiodorus cite this official.

The subject of my contribution might seem very wide. I intend, in fact, to develop it in two main directions: the theatrical shows and those of the circus. If Antioch people’s entertainment reaches its peak in the Olympic Games and Syriarch’s spectacles, more common ones were provided by theatrical shows and chariot-races. I shall study the part of these ordinary spectacles in Antioch people’s life, beginning with generalities on the already well-known world of actors, mimes and pantomimes, without lingering however, in order to move on to what I would like to focus: the circus world, the equestrian competitions which took place in the hippodrome, and the exaltation which they aroused. About the latter, I shall particularly analyse the following aspects: horses-race as a meeting point of the different social classes, and the possibilities for the hippodrome to have had a political function; modalities of circus games organisation and financing: harmatotrophia, and hippotrophia (personal or patrimonial liturgies?); the supply of horses (belonging personally to the bouleutes, or brought by the city?); purchase and resale of horses, which bring about outlay as well as profit. I shall consider these different procedures as being in correlation with one another. I shall also go through the problem of the circus factions in Antioch, on which opinions differ in the absence of textual indications enough definite. I shall notice the strict correlation between bouleutes’ statutory obligations and the passionate phenomena which comes with equestrian games: moral criticism which Libanios carried on circus games leads to an end while accepting the whole liturgical system which would not be called into question.

The repertoire of theatrical iconography sometimes includes a fixed implement which highlights one Greek letter out of five, placed in a semi-circle around the upper half of a disc. This accessory is associated exclusively with stage artists, actors and musicians. It has been identified in the past as a hydraulic organ or bronteion, but its composition corresponds neither to literary descriptions nor to representations. An attentive examination shows that we should also dismiss the hypothesis of an implement for drawing lots, comparable to those used in wrestling and equestrian competitions. Several new interpretations might be offered. Berlin papyrus 13927 suggests that the letters of the motif might correspond to the different parts of a theatrical show. Clearly visible on the stage, the motif could evoke a stagehand’s levers, or even an implement intended to facilitate the synchronisation of the production. It does not allude to any specific event; its image is enough to symbolise the world of the stage in general.

This article gathers the results of the various prospection campaigns carried out in the cellars of the old city center of Apt. It relates to mainly the vestiges of the ancient theatre, and its reoccupying in the 5th and 6th centuries. This contribution also proposes to detail some design features and architectural noted in the re-use of certain spaces of the theatre, as the scene or the curvilinear frontage of the monument.

The Oudhna theatre was not included in the 1993 project of clearing ancient Uthina’s monuments. The importance of the theatre has been acknowledged, however, since Victor Guérin in the mid-19th century. In 2004, the building was studied anew, in order to assess its state of conservation, to establish its chronology, and to plan subsequent archaeological excavations. The results obtained from this preliminary study concern especially the stage wall, but other large structures within the monument (cavea, orchestra) were also assessed. The current data suggest that the theatre was build during the first half of the 2nd century but was transformed in the 6th century (perhaps already in the 4th) into a quarry which included Byzantine era “construction sheds”. Construction materials were still being recovered from it in the 18th and 19th centuries, until Paul Gauckler, then inspector of archaeological excavations within the beylic Antiquities department, had it classified as a protected landmark between 1892 and 1896.

The present study tries to explain the signification of a scene which is on the mosaic so-called “The Children’s hunting”. In this scene, a cock chases a boy, what seems to be an illustration of the defeated gladiator asking for his missio. Indeed, the boy is kneeling down and raises his right hand in an aggressive context. Besides the evocation of the venatio, this mosaic describes a gladiator’s performance. At least, the allusion to the munus is not so obvious since, on the 4th century AD, the gladiature had practically disapparead whereas the venatio were very famous in Africa.

Until now, all the circus reconstruction’s attempts were confronted to the same problem: the lack of a complete comparative study able to give all the necessary arguments to support the given hypothesis. In our previous works, we have just achieved a comparative and functional study of the Roman’s circus to explain the strong links between the function and the shape of this edifice for the Roman spectacles. This comparative and functional study produced a large set of useful informations allowing an architectural reconstruction of Constantinople’s Hippodrome. This study seemed essential because this major building has not been described in the fundamental work of J. H. Humphrey, nor in recent studies, mainly those of Guilland and Dagron, allow a new reading of this monument. Regarding the archaeological data, only few parts of the hippodrome are known. These data were compared with recent studies and ancient sources, the book of the ceremonies from Constantin Porphyrogenitus. The accuracy of the information provided by the text allows to understand the functioning of the building and to reconstruct a large portion of its components (cavea, spina, kathisma and carceres). Thanks to this study, we have gained a clear idea of the architecture of the latest state of the Constantinople’s hippodrome.

L’époque tétrarchique est bien connue pour nous avoir conservé des décisions impériales gravées en latin dans l’Orient grec, et plus particulièrement des textes trouvés en plusieurs exemplaires, ce qui se présente rarement dans les époques précédentes tandis qu’on en compte neuf cas entre 301 et 362. Le présent article concentre son attention sur quatre de ces textes : le premier décret sur les Caesariani de 305, la lettre sur les Caesariani, l’Edictum de Accusationibus (habituellement attribué soit à Constantin, soit à Licinius en 314 ou 320) et le deuxième décret sur les Caesariani. On cherche ici à montrer que ces quatre textes constituent en réalité un seul et même dossier mettant en corrélation trois décisions publiées par Galère durant l’été 305. Le raisonnement se fonde sur les trois points suivants : 1/ ces textes, dont les thèmes sont complémentaires, se retrouvent dans une situation d’association qui se recoupe dans une multiplicité de sites, où ils partagent également des caractères physiques similaires ; 2/ l’unique datation épigraphique explicite est 305 dans le premier décret, auquel, en réalité, la lettre sur les Caesariani tient lieu de préambule et avec lequel l’Edictum de Accusationibus devrait également être associé en raison de l’inscription de Padoue (CIL, V, 2781), ce qui trouverait une ultérieure confirmation si c’est bien l’Edictum que reproduit le texte de Corcyre de 305-306 (AÉp., 2002, 1302). L’indication de date donnée par le Code Théodosien (CTh, IX, 5, 1) est douteuse, on ne doit pas en tenir compte ; 3/ les similitudes entre les formules conclusives dans l’Edictum et dans le deuxième décret sur les Caesariani suggèrent que l’Edictum a été promulgué en même temps qu’un autre édit (le deuxième décret) et qu’une lettre (le premier décret). Le dossier, par conséquent, se compose d’un édit d’indulgence restituant des biens détenus par le fisc, d’une lettre aux préfets du prétoire annulant les injonctions fiscales abusives et prévoyant de les surveiller de plus près à l’avenir, et d’un édit général réglementant et limitant le dépôt d’accusations, qu’elles soient criminelles ou fiscales. Au total, le dossier manifeste un souci de protéger les provinciaux innocents et leurs biens contre les abus perpétrés par des fonctionnaires financiers impériaux comme les Caesariani. Le contexte de l’été 305 convient parfaitement à ce dossier, survenant peu après que Galère était devenu Auguste et au moment où il complotait pour prendre le contrôle du collège impérial à la suite du départ de Constance Chlore attendu comme imminent. L’association d’autres textes épigraphiques multiples (par exemple l’Édit sur les Prix) avec la sphère d’influence de Galère suggère en outre que ce phénomène est la marque du style personnel de gouvernement de Galère, et non pas un trait général de la période.

Les mesures prises par Gratien contre le paganisme en 382 nous sont connues essentiellement par la Relatio III de Q. Aurelius Symmachus et par les Epistulae 72 et 73 d’Ambroise de Milan, que la tradition historiographique a versées au dossier de l’affaire de l’autel de la Victoire. La présente contribution examine ces textes en discutant la nature des décisions qui s’y trouvent décrites. Celles-ci ne furent pas dirigées – comme on le pense généralement – contre tous les sacerdoces païens de Rome, pas plus qu’ils ne provoquèrent la réquisition de tous les fundi templorum, mais bien plutôt renouvelèrent l’ordre d’enlever l’autel de la Victoire de la curie sénatoriale et concernèrent certains des privilèges propres aux Vestales, tels que le stipendium, l’exemption des munera, les annonae et le droit de ce collège à hériter, à l’avenir, d’agri.

In these pages are set out the suits which, inside the clergy, encouraged the life in the Hispanic Churches of the late Antiquity. So it makes emphasis on the factions and fights of power in the different local churches, in front of a false uniformity and stability of the ecclesiastical organization, with a special attention to the Visigoth age. It is not going to try here to do a systematic recount about how many episodes of clashes, in a diocesan see itself, are documented, but to declare some of the examples more significant of such fact, despite the treatment, sometimes crafty one, which our sources have dealt with it.